New webinar! The Fundamentals of Investing in Climate Private Equity. Register here →
New webinar! Sit down with our in-house experts to learn The Fundamentals of Investing in Climate Private Equity. Register here →
Impact in your Inbox | #6
Welcome back to Impact in your Inbox. Our monthly newsletter on all things impact, private equity and climate tech — by Liza Rubinstein, Co-founder and Head of Impact at Carbon Equity. Let’s get to it!
How sustainable are your investments?
Many investors want to have a positive impact on the world alongside making a financial return; however, this isn’t simply done by selecting a sustainable ETF or fund. This article clears up the confusion on ESG investing. Plus, it explores the maze of investing sustainably so you can make more confident investment decisions and have more investor impact.
In short: The widely cited figure for how much the US’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) will spend fighting climate change is $374 billion. This article estimates it could raise to more than $800 billion and eventually equate to roughly $1.7 trillion over the next 10 years.
In short: As the climate crisis worsens and governments reshape markets (with legislation like the IRA), we can expect a surge in climate startups. Venture capital is well-positioned to be a major funder of these startups. More than the money though, top venture capital fund managers also bring valuable experiences and networks to their portfolio companies.
In short: According to Gates, the only real solution to climate change is to innovate and create better and cheaper low-carbon alternatives. Other climate change advocates say that using and consuming less (often called degrowth) is also necessary to get to net zero. What do you think?
In short: The oil and gas industry has been struggling with methane (a potent greenhouse gas) leakages for decades. According to this article, hydrogen also poses a leakage problem that needs fixing through investments in monitoring tech, currently just starting to be developed. We’re on the lookout for more of these technologies.
In short: Clean energy technologies come with a high mineral resources footprint. Can we obtain enough to get to net zero? The IEA detailed its key recommendations: diversification of supply chains and in minerals used, innovation to reduce material intensity and the scaling up of recycling. To get there, we need clear and strong signals from policymakers.
3 awesome innovations
Form Energy is a long-duration electricity storage startup working to help balance our electricity grid. It announced its Series E of $450M, joined by Energy Impact Partners.
Woltair is a marketplace that helps homeowners get to net zero — by connecting them to installers of heat pumps, plus solar and energy storage solutions. ArcTern Ventures led its €16.3M Series A funding round.
Microharvest developed one of the most efficient and easy-to-scale protein production lines. It grows bacteria with great protein content, which can be used for human food or animal feed. It recently raised an €8.5M Series A led by Astanor Ventures.
Show me the data
This visual is showing 16 countries and their ‘decoupling’ of GDP and CO₂ emissions. By 2016, 70 countries, or one in three worldwide, had seen five years of growing GDP while reducing carbon emissions.
You can also see that quite a few countries have decoupled since 1990, like Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Yet for others, it’s more recent: Spain didn’t decouple until the late 2000s, Australia only decoupled after 2010 and Mexico is one of the more recent countries to do so around 2014.
How have many countries been able to decouple their growth and emissions?
For the first 200 years after the invention of the steam engine, economic growth was coupled with carbon emissions. This began to change in the 1980s due to nuclear power. For the first time, countries grew their power supply and increased activities requiring power — without increasing emissions.
The pace of decoupling started to accelerate further once the service economy made its rise and the cost of renewable power plummeted. Here’s one example.
In 2009, coal was still a lot cheaper than renewables. But by 2020, both wind and solar had become far cheaper per unit of energy. This has changed the CO₂ outlook of emerging economies like India. In 2019, the IEA forecasted that the country’s coal facilities would grow by 80% by 2040. A year later, they revised that to just 10%.*
It’s encouraging to see how a mix of investing, innovation and market forces can allow for green growth and emission reductions. However, we still must channel trillions in investments, continue innovating and establish strong market forces to reach our net zero goals.
Note: GDP isn’t a perfect measure of economic or human wellbeing. That said, increasing GDP while reducing emissions is a good indicator for this exercise.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Any information presented on this website does not constitute, and under no circumstances shall this information be deemed or construed to be a prospectus, an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for an interest in the feeder funds or fund of funds of Carbon Equity B.V. “Funds”, unless clearly indicated otherwise. No part of this information or the fact that of its distribution should form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract or commitment or investment decision whatsoever.
The issue and distribution of any information on this website may be subject to statutory or other restrictions in certain jurisdictions. Carbon Equity B.V. requests that individuals taking possession of this information familiarise themselves with and comply with those restrictions. Carbon Equity B.V. rejects liability for any violation of any such restriction by anyone whomsoever, regardless of whether that individual is a potential investor. This website in itself does not entail any offer of any security or an invitation to make an offer to purchase any security to any individual in any jurisdiction where such is not permitted according to the applicable law and regulations.
The Funds of Carbon Equity B.V. will only be offered to potential investors at a later stage pursuant to fund documentation to be prepared and distributed by Carbon Equity B.V., through a dedicated account environment and clearly indicated as such. Any person should note that the Carbon Equity B.V. Funds will eventually exclusively be offered by Carbon Equity B.V. to potential investors in permitted jurisdictions who commit to an initial investment of at least EUR 100,000 or fall under other applicable exemptions. Carbon Equity B.V. will act as the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) of the Funds and will benefit from the Dutch sub-threshold regime, pursuant to article 2:66a of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht).
As such, the Carbon Equity B.V. will benefit from an exemption from the license requirement and ongoing requirements of the AIFMD. Moreover, no prospectus requirement applies in light of article 1(4)(d) of the Prospectus Regulation. Any Funds and Carbon Equity B.V. will therefore fall outside the scope of supervision of the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten, AFM) and the Dutch Central Bank (De Nederlandsche Bank, DNB)
Carbon Equity does not make investment recommendations and no communication, through this website or in any other medium should be construed as a recommendation for any security offered on or off this investment platform. Alternative investments in private placements, and private equity investments via feeder funds in particular, are speculative and involve a high degree of risk and those investors who cannot afford to lose their entire investment should not invest. Prospective investors should carefully consider the risk warnings and disclosures for the respective fund or investment vehicle set out therein. The value of an investment may go down as well as up and investors may not get back their money originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. An investment in a fund or investment vehicle is not the same as a deposit with a banking institution. Please refer to the respective fund documentation for details about potential risks, charges and expenses. Additionally, investors will typically receive illiquid and/or restricted membership interests that may be subject to holding period requirements and/or liquidity concerns. In the most sensible investment strategy for venture capital investing, venture capital should only be a part of your overall investment portfolio. Further, the venture capital portion of your portfolio may include a balanced portfolio of different venture capital funds. Investments in venture capital are highly illiquid and those investors who cannot hold an investment for the long term (at least 10 years) should not invest.